A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos
✓Claimant Carlos Alberto Mantilla Gutierrez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el auto que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia, por cuanto no fue subsanada en los términos indicados en el auto de inadmisión y se continuó con el incumplimiento del deber de presentar cargos específicos, pertinentes y suficientes.
La Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el Auto del 12 de mayo de 2017, mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad formulada por el ciudadano Carlos Alberto Mantilla Gutiérrez contra los artículos 13 (parcial), 36 (parcial), 186 (parcial) y 188 de la Ley 685 de 2001.
- SEGUNDO. COMUNÍQUESE la presente providencia al peticionario, informándole que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.